#Gamesalad vs corona android#
This was the picture at the onset of 2012, although it becomes less important as iOS and Android continue to dominate the market and most tools then cover all the major platforms. Meanwhile Netbiscuits, as with other solutions leveraging web apps and PhoneGap, is very well rounded in terms of its mobile platform support.ĭeveloper selection criteria are heavily skewed towards the breadth of platforms supported by each tool. It’s also worth noting Unity, which supports an impressive range of desktop and game console platforms. These were followed closely by Marmalade, MoSync and PhoneGap, which reflects their broad mobile platform coverage. RunRev’s Livecode which is deployable to web and desktop (though only iOS and Android on mobile) comes next. Sencha and jQuery Mobile score top marks for platform reach – based on our developer survey – thanks to the ubiquity of JavaScript frameworks. Runtimes and source code translation tools have the broadest platform reach. The most important CPT selection criterion is the breadth of platforms that the tool supports, cited by nearly 60% of respondents. Fortunately, we have this data from our cross-platform tools survey earlier in the year.Īccess to additional platforms is the #1 selection criterion
However, it’s valuable to look at the criteria other developers have used to select development tool and, even more importantly, the reasons they’ve stopped using them. With the wide selection of cross-platform development tool (CPTs) available in the market, how should a developer select a development tool? The exact selection criteria will vary depending on the project and the individual developers involved.
0 kommentar(er)
